top of page

Anthropology of Technology: Reconceptualizing the Human in New Materialism

  • Anna Puzio
  • Apr 1
  • 1 min read

In this journal article, I develop a conception of the human and an anthropology grounded in the New Materialism of Donna Haraway and Karen Barad:


Puzio, A. The entangled human being – a new materialist approach to anthropology of technology. AI Ethics 5, 2339–2356 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00537-z "Technological advancements raise anthropological questions: How do humans differ from technology? Which human capabilities are unique? Is it possible for robots to exhibit consciousness or intelligence, capacities once taken to be exclusively human? Despite the evident need for an anthropological lens in both societal and research contexts, the philosophical anthropology of technology has not been established as a set discipline with a defined set of theories, especially concerning emerging technologies. In this paper, I will utilize a New Materialist approach, focusing particularly on the theories of Donna Haraway and Karen Barad, to explore their potential for an anthropology of technology. I aim to develop a techno-anthropological approach that is informed and enriched by New Materialism. This approach is characterized by its relational perspective, a dynamic and open conception of the human being, attention to diversity and the dynamics of power in knowledge production and ontology, and an emphasis on the non-human. I aim to outline an anthropology of technology centered on New Materialism, wherein the focus, paradoxically, is not exclusively on humans but equally on non-human entities and the entanglement with the non-human. As will become clear, the way we understand humans and their relationship with technology is fundamental for our concepts and theories in ethics of technology."

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Material Agency of a Large Language Model

AI isn’t magic ✨ 🧚‍♀️ —it’s a material industry. There's growing debate about the agency of LLMs, AI agents, and agentic AI. In my article “The Material Agency of a Large Language Model” in the journ

 
 
 
The Relational Turn in AI Ethics

David Gunkel, Joshua Gellers, and I have published a paper in the journal AI & Society in which we respond to recent criticisms of the relational turn in AI ethics. You can read it here: Gunkel, D.,

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page